Monday, September 3, 2007

Meaningful Architecture - then and now

At our final intensive assignment Herb wanted us to think about the implementation of the NCARB IDP process and our thesis statement. My thesis statement on “Why create poetic or meaningful Architecture? From the xs to the XL” had a question raised by a colleague. The question was “How Architecture becomes meaningful? I think Architecture is meaningful to everyone in many different ways. It depends on how we occupy the space as well as our place in time of living. From the origins of humanity it was for shelter, to recognize death, protection, and then religion, so on and so forth.

On my quest to explain “Why”, I started not by defining the poetic, but by thinking about what is the meaningful part. Perhaps because this question was raised, otherwise I would probably have gone straight for the definition. Meaningful Architecture can be very broad and I don’t think I will ever be able to cover all the reasons why and how we occupy our spaces depending on our cultural backgrounds.

From the thinking of what meaningful is, I ended up in Why was Architecture ever created? Shelter is my first response, was the cave man inspired by the cave itself in the rock formation? The first “Hut” or “Igloo” was generated as a result of the need to relocate, agglomerate or necessity of space. Time passed by and humans created tools for hunting and defense; therefore Architecture evolved. This exercise of developing tools for defense seems to be still implemented in today’s world. Items such as stainless steel and microwaves were invented as a result of defense necessity. I wonder what came out of the present war (in relation to technological advance only). Google earth?

The ancient world of Mesopotamia and Babylonia with their monumental Architecture created by settlers evolved the earlier agglomerations of settlers into our first fortified villages.

On two of my recent trips this year I visited Jinotega, Nicaragua and the town of Sandwich, Massachusetts. These two towns had different types of meaningful Architecture.

In Nicaragua, the outskirts of Jinotega had many little structures along the side of the road. They were mini houses occupied by local peasants. The walls were constructed of horizontal wood boards and corrugated metal panels, soil floors, no bathrooms, no electricity or running water. The forest and single latrines are used in lieu of toilets, water creeks are used for water consumption. Some of the more sophisticated structures had electricity and satellite TV, but no hard floors, this was unsettling to me.

The town of Sandwich has an original house erected by early settlers from Europe. The dwellings were shaped like their saltboxes. The kitchens provided heat, cooking and space to gather. There was no electrical power or running water. The settlers shower only once a year, mainly in June because the season is warmer. Therefore people were only clean during this month. The Story tellers claimed the tradition of June weddings are a result of this.

Meaningful Architecture in these two experiences is similar in that they both provide some type of shelter, and that was important to the dweller. In Nicaragua, the dwelling, aside from sheltering, was also located to provide access to the road to get to work and to be off the Town grid (cost of city living). In Sandwich, the dwelling was a symbol of ownership and prosperity.

According to the local town history early U.S. settlers erected structures that took a bit of time to build, a year or so after working everyday. They also had thought about a layout that was functional to all of their occupants. The little structures in Nicaragua seem as they were put together in a short period of time, four walls, a door, a roof and called it home. The early U.S. settlers could have built just four walls as well.

What’s also consistent in Architecture, regardless of the occupancy, is that people create spaces or places to make them their own. By this I mean the body occupying a space. The argument I like to present is that Architecture should not be about just putting up four walls or to say who we are and declare our social status. Architecture should create Poetic spaces that allow inhabitants of all races and cultures to interpret and define their own space.

Poetic Architecture should allow the user to celebrate joy, delight, mourning, love, meditate, feel anger, compassion, etc. As Herb commented, this definition of Poetic Architecture is expected to change, grow and become more enriched. Already a bit of research and comments from colleagues have provided me with more inquiries into how it was in the past and where we are heading. The current heading of Architecture is what troubles me, the past is done.

Because “Meaningful” can be many things to many people, the challenge then becomes creating meaning for the structure's intended occupants – versus defining "meaning" in one vast proverbial bucket.



Outskirts of Jinotega, Nicaragua


Sandwich, Massachusetts

5 comments:

annie j kemp said...

What a great and challenging topic! I am anxious to see what you discover. I went to Fiji a few years ago and remember noticing the same thing as you did in Nicaragua. Some of the homes were pieces of sheet metal forming the walls and roofs with additions haphazardly placed whenever a new child was born. They started with the necessity and as the family developed, they changed their home. This evolution of their home seems to be similar to our evolution of meaning in our homes. It started off as basic shelter and has developed into so much more. We still look for a list of requirements we want out of a space but how do you incorporate more? When did we start building for the future (planning the extra bedrooms versus adding on as the family grew)? I anxiously await to see what you come up with.

Jaclyn said...

Eddie,
Have you heard of the book Minimalist Interiors by Paco Ansenio? It is a great book. Wait did I just send you a reference? Isn’t this backwards?? Knowing you, you probably already have it. But anyway…I think this has a lot to do with what you are looking into. It deals with taking the ideas of home that our society currently has and reducing everything down to the necessity. Too often we are designing these large homes for people and they go over budget. Why not produce a smaller home that has the care and precision put into the details rather than a grand home that isn’t as elegant? I’ve had the book since undergrad and just started to revisit it again. There are some really great points in it. Hope you can find it near you.

-Jaclyn

Eddie Alvarado said...

Ladies,

This challenge has been harder than I thought. I have been thinking about poetic space and Architecture ever since I graduated a few years ago and now I find myself looking for a way to educate clients and society on Why we should not settle for the four walls and a piece of metal. Certainly the necessity for shelter has evolved with the evolution of human beings.

Is interesting what you say Annie about people changing their home as the family developed. I am passionate about learning from different cultures. If I may make reference to the floor plan of the U.S dweller, it is different from what the hispanic dwelling is. In the U.S. we layout floor plans for homes where the master bedroom is separate from the rest of the bedrooms. The hispanic house locates the master bedroom adjacent to the rest of the bedrooms. It is really interesting to see how the same label of a structure known as "house" takes a different layout depending on the society it occupies. This is where I try to incorporate Poetic space, where the occupant gives life to the space occupying the way they want.
Building for the future is going to become more of the personalized occupancy, there is a company in Norway "Telenor" that is officeless and paperless. Thechnology is enabling us to start cutting back on unnecessary things. Our Distance Master is great example of how we could study not even in the future, but now.
On recent readings I have found that poetic space is also creating structures that are alive themselves, so now it has become more challenging to identify what the poetic really is.
On an end note, Jacklyn, I have never seen that book! See, I am not the book junkie you thought I was, okay maybe I am, but have never seen that book. I google it and found that the writer is Paco "ASENSIO" not Ansenio. :-) Keep the references coming!

Unknown said...

Eddie,

I am entirely surprised at how this topic has become so riveting for me. It is truly poetic in the method of which each topic has evolved from the first post-it note assaulted draft on the studio walls to the truly diverse topics of provocation. I too admire your breadth of research knowledge and appreciate learning from you. One question that came to mind, “Have you given thought on the practicality of a poetic design solution for the poor who occupy these make-shift structures? How will poetry of space become an embraced notion for those who dwell in areas like favelas of Brazil, or what about those labeled the “undesirables” in China?” I only ask because necessity is such an overriding compulsion and let’s not forget the fact that most that are poor need to quickly dismantle and bring their shelter with them to the next location. It is almost 3 am here and I have a BIG deadline tomorrow for Dallas AIA submissions. I am eager to explore this more and I look forward to your discoveries.

How about poetry in cities?
check this link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/9793231@N05/sets/72157600706628117/

Unknown said...

Eddie,

(on your draft)

I have reviewed your paper this morning and I still find the topic to be interesting although I wonder if some of the poetry has been lost. I am not sure you need to start at the hunter gather stage of human kind to illustrate this topic. As a matter of fact, actual permanent dwellings were not erected until the development of agriculture and as you have commented on your blog, the sandwich town, these spaces were still just utilitarian.

[The transition to the poetic Architecture should not be about just putting up four walls or to say who we are and declare our social status. Architecture should create Poetic spaces that allow inhabitants of all races and cultures to interpret and define their own space as well as to seek further development of our beings through Architecture.]

How does this IDEA become available to all people regardless of social status or economics? I return to my original question, “How do you ensure poetry in architecture for everyone, how can everyone afford the price tag that comes with these beautiful spaces?” Will I one day go shopping at a chain superstore in a shopping center modeled on the Louvre? Is this use of poetic architecture for the masses a bastardization when it is put into this context? Is it truly suitable as a design standard? Is this “Design like I give a damn” or “the next design star challenge”? I am truly fascinated to see what you discover.